Re: X-Files2?

24
haha, i love the comments. like the first one where they say i bet this is a dream sequence or something, lol. then this:
X-Files is getting really stale these days, give me Twin Peaks anyday!
heh.

Re: X-Files2?

25
Dream sequence? I guess it's been long enough that people have forgotten Mulder and Scully basically end up romantically involved for the last several seasons of the show. Granted, it was handled so poorly between Duchovny whining/leaving the set and the idea they could protract the 'tension' any longer in any meaningful way that I understand where that factoid might have fallen through the cracks...they have a kid somewhere living with 'normal folks,' if memory serves...and yes, even with its Season 2 issues, Twin Peaks will always rule over the X-Files and its other progeny.
"I'm like a dog chasing cars, I wouldn't know what to do if I caught one. . . . I'm not a schemer. I just do things."

Re: X-Files2?

26
News:
`X-Files' creator spills film details

By DERRIK J. LANG, AP Entertainment Writer 2 hours, 44 minutes ago

LOS ANGELES - The truth about "The X-Files" sequel — some of it, anyway — is now out there.

"X-Files" creator Chris Carter, writer Frank Spotnitz and other crew members gathered Wednesday to discuss the TV series — and declassify some information about the upcoming film.

The popular Fox paranormal drama, which aired from 1993 to 2002, starred David Duchovny and Gillian Anderson as FBI agents Fox Mulder and Dana Scully

"While this is not a mythology movie, it's true to everything that's come before," Spotnitz said at the William S. Paley Television Festival. "It's true to Mulder and Scully, who they are and where they would be this point in their lives and all of the experiences that they've had."

The series first made the leap to the big screen with 1998's "The X-Files: Fight the Future." Plans for another film were grounded in 2005 when Carter sued Fox over syndication profits for the show. The lawsuit was later settled.

Carter, who also directs the new movie, said it takes place in the present and uses a story envisioned when the series ended. While the show's sprawling alien mythology isn't part of the plot, Carter said there is a reference to Scully's seemingly supernatural son, William, who was born in season eight and later given up for adoption.

The film is due out July 25.

Carter was tightlipped about the title.

"I can't tell you," he said. "I know what I want it to be, but Fox has some ideas of their own."
This is a snakeskin jacket. And for me it's a symbol of my individuality and my belief in personal freedom.

Re: X-Files2?

27
watched an X-Files marathon on friday. it was more than nostalgia, it holds up nicely. made me very excited for this. disappointed to hear about the lack of the mythology...

Re: X-Files2?

28
Personally I think they're downplaying the mythology but there will be some. It's better marketing to describe it as a stand-alone, but I've read bits here and there that mention Mulder's sister, some secret cast members coming back, this little blurb from today...
"I'm like a dog chasing cars, I wouldn't know what to do if I caught one. . . . I'm not a schemer. I just do things."

Re: X-Files2?

29
Alexhead wrote:Personally I think they're downplaying the mythology but there will be some. It's better marketing to describe it as a stand-alone, but I've read bits here and there that mention Mulder's sister, some secret cast members coming back, this little blurb from today...
probably truth. i could see that.

one of the episodes they aired in the marathon was the one in the south american indian ruins with the "real" death of Cancer Man. do you think he's dead? i mean, he had a tracheotomy at that point already and was old, so he would have probably been dead in 10 years if not for the giant missile. but maybe deep throat?

Re: X-Files2?

32
Here's a more complete description of the Paley fest panel:
By James Hibberd

"The X-Files" ended its run on Fox six years ago, but its writers and producers can still grouse about working on the show like it was yesterday.

The Paley Festival session on the long-running hit series featured a dozen members of the cast and crew. The overall theme of the evening was that working "The X-Files" was very hard. In terms of news value, the panel was trapped in an “X-Files”-esque netherworld: The TV show is yester-decade's news, while this summer's new "X-Files" movie is of very high interest. Yet creator Chris Carter is naturally unwilling to give any spoilers. The panel moderator -- Variety deputy editor Cynthia Littleton -- is thus charged with the tricky task of either asking about a series that's been endlessly discussed, or asking about a movie that cannot be discussed. Plus, charismatic leads David Duchovny and Gillian Anderson did not attend. So, again, tricky.

Luckily, some fine nuggets were nonetheless unearthed about the movie, those controversial final seasons, dealing with Fox censors and the bizarre "X-Files" 9/11 connection.

The movie

The second "X-Files" movie was delayed due to Carter's 2005 lawsuit against 20th Century Fox Television claiming the studio short-changed him on syndication fees. Carter says the moment the lawsuit settled out of court, Fox was ready to do the movie.

The film has wrapped shooting and is currently scheduled for release on July 25. The trailer (shown twice for an enthusiastic Paley crowd) features lots of snow, running, a large syringe and a helicopter.

Most everything else is pretty hush-hush, including the title.

"I know what I want it to be, but Fox has ideas of their own," Carter says. "I know what it should be."

The film will pick up six years after the end of the series. It's supposed to be a standalone feature removed from the alien mythology of the TV show, a throwback to the show's "monster of the week" episodes. Still, some lingering aspects from the series, like whether Scully's child will be a normal tyke, will be addressed.

"It will not be a mythology movie, but it's true to everything that's come before," says writer-producer Frank Spotnitz.


The final seasons


Let's quickly check off the ways "X-Files" influenced modern primetime TV: Strong female investigator, serialized story lines, sci-fi themes, writers taking story cues from online message boards -- "The X-Files" trailblazed. "Lost," "Heroes," "Jericho," "Battlestar Galactica," "Buffy the Vampire Slayer"... the entire modern pantheon of Geek-TV owes a huge debt.

And then there's the last few seasons, eight and nine in particular. The series' tortured final years wound down like some sort of cautionary tale of network timeslot addiction: The quasi-recasting of the lead characters (fans, meet agents Doggett and Reyes), the constant cliffhangers upon cliffhangers, the Gordian knot of tangled alien mythology that no amount of Scully's logic or Mulder's theories could ever explain, even the inevitable ill-conceived spinoff with minor characters expanded to leading actor status -- remember "The Lone Gunmen"?

"X-Files" finally died in 2002. The ending: Yet another cliffhanger. When it came to giving loyal fans closure, "X-Files" makes "The Sopranos" look like "The Love Boat."

Yet the show's meandering third act also became influential, teaching an inadvertent lesson. The producers of "Lost" almost certainly would not be so eager to set an end date for their South Pacific island adventure if not for "The X-Files." Same with "Battlestar." For serialized shows, there's now a powerful desire to conclude with class and style. The creative meltdown of the "X-Files" is oft-cited as the exact model to avoid: "You don't want to go out like that" is the fanboy refrain, as if "X-Files" died of a long bout with pancreatic cancer rather than simply airing a few mediocre seasons.

Littleton asks Carter if he had any regrets about the final season. The room goes dead quiet.

"I'm not going to admit to my regrets," Carter says. "I look back [and wonder] why did I make that choice ... [but] you never imagine it's going to go nine years ... you have an idea where you're going to, but you don't know how long it's going to take you to get there ... you're always going to be dealing with a new landscape each week ... I'm going to say, no, I have no regrets."

Translation: Of course I have regrets, but, really, how do I benefit from listing them here and now?

Carter's process seems to be very, as creatives like to say, organic. He notes that he was largely winging the mythology story line and that having a series bible -- standard practice for a show -- is "a really stupid idea because they can fire you and get somebody else." He added that the mythologies of the show flowed together and the "connections were really beautiful" in the middle of the series' run.

The sense is that Carter didn't try to impose his will over the direction of the show, which resulted in a character-driven, flowing story that went wherever it wanted, for better or worse.

Watching the crew reminisce together, one is also reminded of the bottom-line reality of what it means to end a television show: You and all your co-workers, many of whom are your friends, lose their jobs.


9/11


Here's what happened in the short-lived "The Lone Gunmen" spinoff's March 2001 pilot episode: The Lone Gunmen stop a plot to hijack a plane and fly it into the World Trade Center. Really. How did they react to the September terrorist attacks having dramatized a very similar scenario just six months prior?

"It was freaky, and one of the weirdest things is no one really asked us about it," Carter says. "It had been imagined before, by many others."

"Condoleezza Rice is saying its an unimaginable crime -- hello, my pilot!" adds "Lone Gunmen" actor Dean Haglund.

"It made me angry," Spotnitz says. "It was not unimaginable. My first thought was ... 'Oh my god, I hope they weren't copycatting the Lone Gunmen, which they weren't. My next thought was: 'Why weren't we prepared for this?' "


Odds and ends


"You get these magnificent sculptures and it ends up being a rubber suit on a guy and they look stupid. So you want to turn all the lights off because I can see the suit and I start laughing and I can't direct the scene." -- director Rob Bowman on how silly monster costumes helped inspire the show's distinctive low-lit look.

[Hearing the show's theme music for the first time] "I'm like, 'What the hell is that?' And Chris is like, 'I like this; it's like whistling in a graveyard.' And I'm like, 'Whatever' ... Chris wanted to leave room at the end of the credits for 'The Truth Is Out There,' and I'm like, 'What for?" -- writer-producer Glen Morgan, gamely reciting how Carter was clued in to how some of the show's signature elements would be effective early on.

"They said you can't deal with necrophilia, you cannot put necrophilia on television. So I thought, 'What do I do now?' So I just called him a death fetishist ... and they said, 'that's great.' " -- Carter in getting his first solo scripted episode, "Irresistible," past Fox censors.

"At that point it was very polite and very helpful then ... it exploded and became vicious ... and it became unhelpful." -- Morgan on how online message boards aided writers with constructive feedback before devolving into a flamewar.

"The problem in television is the train doesn't stop. Every eight days is a new show ... that drive wears you down" -- Bowman on the "X-Files" workload.

"It will not go unconsidered in the movie," -- Carter on giving fans some added insight into whether Scully's baby turned out normal vs. paranormal.

"We've talked about it over the years ... Lance [Henriksen] would love to do it ... [but] it's a long shot" -- Carter, on doing a follow-up to "Millennium."

"I came up first day I got the whole suit on and Duchovny comes up to me and he shakes my hand and I've never met him before and he leans into me and says: 'Why are you doing this?'" -- Darin Morgan, on playing fan favorite monster-in-a-suit Flukeman.

"It never got easy. In the nine years, it was always difficult trying never to repeat yourself" -- Spotnitz, on workload.

"I never had a good sense of how popular it was, I had my head down ... working to make my deadlines. Not until we did the movie" -- Carter, on "X-Files" popularity.
http://reporter.blogs.com/paley/2008/03 ... files.html
"I'm like a dog chasing cars, I wouldn't know what to do if I caught one. . . . I'm not a schemer. I just do things."

Re: X-Files2?

33
Alexhead wrote:Oh I'm sure they can drag cancer man back assuming the actor's still around.

Hey! New Trailer--Watch it while you can!
Too slow, I missed it. :cry:
Are you propositioning me? I taste like candy and you want the recipe?

Re: X-Files2?

35
sucks you didn't get to see it. i'm sure it'll show up again.

in the meantime, here are some interviews for you. after watching this, i believe them when they say they won't be dealing with the alien mythology in this one. :|

Re: X-Files2?

36
I had a friend tell me today he understands there's a lot of misinformation being put out there about the movie by the principals, so don't get too worried yet...although he also says he's heard that Amanda Peet and Xibit take up the first hour of the movie, that Mulder/Scully don't show up until after that and that Fox is thinking they can spin Peet/Xibit into their own show from this...hopefully my friend's sources on this are full of shit.
"I'm like a dog chasing cars, I wouldn't know what to do if I caught one. . . . I'm not a schemer. I just do things."

Re: X-Files2?

37
in a nice bone-toss to the hardcore fanbase, the new film has its name:
633439574591093750[1].jpg
the poster that's been hanging in Mulder's office since day 1. to anyone unfamiliar with the show, i'm sure the title seems pretty weak. but then again, i'm guessing that's not the target audience.

good move.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Re: X-Files2?

39
harmo wrote:This is for you, TC:



I've been watching one of the box sets--the season with "Home" in it, heh..and I think they hold up too.
awesome, thanks. i've even been listening to that Hal single 'Extremis' with her on it. i'm a fucking nerd.