he should have given the honest answer - she has fucked herself up beyond recognition. i mean, i assumed if donna returned, it would be kelly anyway. hoped.darkness wrote:At least for the example they had the tact to mention Boyle and not Anderson. I'm sure his answer would have been even more annoyed.
It seems a lot more likely that MJA has gone off the deep end (especially considering the other stuff he posts) than that Lynch had Jack Nance killed.TC wrote:and yeah, MJA is either 100% right and lynch is silencing him (not likely) or he's 100% gone off the deep end and we'll not see him in anything else, ever.
and raped his own daughter, and has been actively silencing her for years, and that twin peaks is based on this.darkness wrote:It seems a lot more likely that MJA has gone off the deep end (especially considering the other stuff he posts) than that Lynch had Jack Nance killed.TC wrote:and yeah, MJA is either 100% right and lynch is silencing him (not likely) or he's 100% gone off the deep end and we'll not see him in anything else, ever.
quick thoughts - fucking amazing. beyond what i expected. lynch isn't holding back, he dived right back into it immediately. THIS is how you make a new "film" that takes place in a familiar universe. he clearly still has something to say. this isn't just a nostalgia trip. i need to watch it again. couldn't stay up to watch 3&4, hope to tonight, then i'll rewatch all 4h.darkness wrote:Well, I guess tonight we got Lynch's response to Anderson:
was just telling someone that it may be my favorite 2h of lynch in existence. need to watch again, but 3 & 4 up tonight.O-dot wrote:Tonally, the episodes felt way more like the Mulholland Drive show we never got than they do Twin Peaks.
It may as well be. Everything about these episodes screams Mulholland Drive. The pacing, the way he framed and held shots, the acting style, the digressions into little scenes that don't seem to relate to the main story.And yes. This has Mulholland Drive written all over it. Not sure if it's the same universe really, but the feel is the same.
That's just the way he directs these days I guess. It creates that tone. It's so clearly a beast devoid of network restraints. Not saying everything is perfect so far (would be weird and too good to be true if that was the case) but the most important thing for me is the tone. And that's just right. Just right.O-dot wrote:It may as well be. Everything about these episodes screams Mulholland Drive. The pacing, the way he framed and held shots, the acting style, the digressions into little scenes that don't seem to relate to the main story.And yes. This has Mulholland Drive written all over it. Not sure if it's the same universe really, but the feel is the same.
Especially since it's most likely them that should be compared to Twin Peaks and not the other way around.klimov wrote:Personally, I find the comparisons to Fargo, True Detective and Lost in this and other reviews rather facile.
doesn't matter. if you've watched the first four episodes, we have to wait another 2.5 weeks before a new one. right? i'll just be re-watching the first four until then._Marcus_ wrote:Why is it not Sunday tomorrow???
from the article:_Marcus_ wrote:Especially since it's most likely them that should be compared to Twin Peaks and not the other way around.klimov wrote:Personally, I find the comparisons to Fargo, True Detective and Lost in this and other reviews rather facile.
watched 3 & 4 last night. they were fine. obviously not nearly as powerful as 1 & 2 (i'd love 18h of that).Of course, it’s ridiculous to suggest that “Twin Peaks” is borrowing these elements so much as borrowing them back.
